But this adoption does not the change the legal nature of china ' s maritime procedure , which is still action in personam and presents no conflicts with the civil procedure 但这种吸收，没有改变我国海事诉讼对人诉讼的根本原则，没有在海事诉讼和民事诉讼间产生矛盾和冲突。
3.
To demonstrate the independent meaning of habito , the author compare the habitio ad the right of house rent in the conception to distinguish the jur in rem and jur in personam strictly 依据严格区分物权与债权的观念，对居住权与房屋租赁权进行了比较研究，彰显了居住权的独立意义。
4.
On the other hand , it weakens the distinction between " right of things " and " obligation " , " right of things " are no longer the typical rights in rem , contractual rights are no longer the typical rights in personam 最后认为:价值化一方面使物权和债权统一起来，另一方面使债权和物权都在不同的程度上与其传统的形象和特质背离，逐渐消解二者之间的严格的界限。
5.
Land allotment becomes unequal with the change of population . the ownership of land has ambiguous character , vacant subject and incomplete capacity . the right to operate contracted landing is right in personam and should be changed into right in rem 从理论上分析产生问题的原因主要有：一是土地所有权的性质模糊、主体虚位、权能残缺，二是土地承包经营权不规范，应为物权而是为债权，具有债权的不稳定性。
6.
The inherent benefit appears in the form of personal right and property right ; the benefit of performance appears in the form of jur in personam ; but the reliance interests ca n ' t appears in the form of some rights . there is no right reflecting the reliance interests 在表现形式上，固有利益可表现为人身权、物权等，履行利益可表现为合同债权，但信赖利益没有自己的表现形式，与之相对应也没有相应的权利。
7.
This article contains three parts , namely , preface , body and conclusion . the preface mainly introduces the discussing subject and writing purposes of this article . body is divided into four parts : from the beginning of actio in rem and actio in personam in roman law , the first part detailedly inspects and analyses the formation process of the dual rights system in historical research methods ; the second part discusses the theoretical framework of the dual rights structure from the aspect of system ; the third part mainly analyses the middle rights and the integration of real rights and creditor ’ s rights and the reasons for the emergence of these phenomena , pointing out that the emergence of these phenomena is unevitable in civil law system which ajusts social relationship with systematic code , and how 正文分为四个部分:第一部分采用历史研究的方法,从罗马法上的对人之诉和对物之诉出发,对物债二分体系的形成过程进行了细致的考察和分析;第二部分从体系化的角度讨论了物债二分体系的理论构成,对其理论架构进行了总体上的研究;第三部分着重分析了物权与债权的融合和中间状态及其出现这些现象的原因,指出在运用体系化的方法调整社会关系的过程中,出现物权和债权中间状态的权利形态是不可避免的现象,并对如何正确看待这些问题进行了论证;第四部分在前文论述的基础上,对我国一些学者提出的制定财产法和设立财产法总则的观点的可行性进行了分析,指出无论是从我国大陆法系的传统还是从技术层面来看,制定财产法或设立财产法总则都是不可行的。
